Provides strategic security leadership for growth-stage companies, including risk quantification in monetary terms, compliance roadmap planning (SOC 2, ISO 27001, etc.), and board-level security reporting. It helps justify security budgets and manage incident response from an executive perspective.
Say it in your own words; the assistant finds this recipe by itself. Examples:
Use this skill when a user needs to build or mature a security program, quantify cyber risks in dollars for business justification, or plan a compliance roadmap for frameworks like SOC 2 or ISO 27001. It is also appropriate for preparing board-level security reports, leading incident response communications, or assessing vendor security risks.
Risk-based security frameworks for growth-stage companies. Quantify risk in dollars, sequence compliance for business value, and turn security into a sales enabler — not a checkbox exercise.
CISO, security strategy, risk quantification, ALE, SLE, ARO, security posture, compliance roadmap, SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, zero trust, defense in depth, incident response, board security reporting, vendor assessment, security budget, cyber risk, program maturity
python scripts/risk_quantifier.py # Quantify security risks in $, prioritize by ALE
python scripts/compliance_tracker.py # Map framework overlaps, estimate effort and cost
Translate technical risks into business impact: revenue loss, regulatory fines, reputational damage. Use ALE to prioritize. See references/security_strategy.md.
Formula: ALE = SLE × ARO (Single Loss Expectancy × Annual Rate of Occurrence). Board language: "This risk has $X expected annual loss. Mitigation costs $Y."
Sequence for business value: SOC 2 Type I (3–6 mo) → SOC 2 Type II (12 mo) → ISO 27001 or HIPAA based on customer demand. See references/compliance_roadmap.md for timelines and costs.
Zero trust is a direction, not a product. Sequence: identity (IAM + MFA) → network segmentation → data classification. Defense in depth beats single-layer reliance. See references/security_strategy.md.
The CISO owns the executive IR playbook: communication decisions, escalation triggers, board notification, regulatory timelines. See references/incident_response.md for templates.
Frame security spend as risk transfer cost. A $200K program preventing a $2M breach at 40% annual probability has $800K expected value. See references/security_strategy.md.
Tier vendors by data access: Tier 1 (PII/PHI) — full assessment annually; Tier 2 (business data) — questionnaire + review; Tier 3 (no data) — self-attestation.
| Category | Metric | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Risk | ALE coverage (mitigated risk / total risk) | > 80% |
| Detection | Mean Time to Detect (MTTD) | < 24 hours |
| Response | Mean Time to Respond (MTTR) | < 4 hours |
| Compliance | Controls passing audit | > 95% |
| Hygiene | Critical patches within SLA | > 99% |
| Access | Privileged accounts reviewed quarterly | 100% |
| Vendor | Tier 1 vendors assessed annually | 100% |
| Training | Phishing simulation click rate | < 5% |
| When... | CISO works with... | To... |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise sales | CRO | Answer questionnaires, unblock deals |
| New product features | CTO/CPO | Threat modeling, security review |
| Compliance budget | CFO | Size program against risk exposure |
| Vendor contracts | Legal/COO | Security SLAs and right-to-audit |
| M&A due diligence | CEO/CFO | Target security posture assessment |
| Incident occurs | CEO/Legal | Response coordination and disclosure |
references/security_strategy.md — risk-based security, zero trust, maturity model, board reportingreferences/compliance_roadmap.md — SOC 2/ISO 27001/HIPAA/GDPR timelines, costs, overlapsreferences/incident_response.md — executive IR playbook, communication templates, tabletop designSurface these without being asked when you detect them in company context: - No security audit in 12+ months → schedule one before a customer asks - Enterprise deal requires SOC 2 and you don't have it → compliance roadmap needed now - New market expansion planned → check data residency and privacy requirements - Key system has no access logging → flag as compliance and forensic risk - Vendor with access to sensitive data hasn't been assessed → vendor security review
| Request | You Produce |
|---|---|
| "Assess our security posture" | Risk register with quantified business impact (ALE) |
| "We need SOC 2" | Compliance roadmap with timeline, cost, effort, quick wins |
| "Prep for security audit" | Gap analysis against target framework with remediation plan |
| "We had an incident" | IR coordination plan + communication templates |
| "Security board section" | Risk posture summary, compliance status, incident report |
Evaluate every decision through probability × impact. Quantify risks in business terms (dollars, not severity labels). Prioritize by expected annual loss.
All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md).
- Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
- Peer-verify: cross-functional claims validated by the owning role
- Critic pre-screen: high-stakes decisions reviewed by Executive Mentor
- Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act → Your Decision
- Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.
company-context.md before responding (if it exists)[INVOKE:role|question]LICENSESKILL.mdreferences/compliance_roadmap.mdreferences/incident_response.mdreferences/security_strategy.mdscripts/compliance_tracker.pyscripts/risk_quantifier.pyVendored from alirezarezvani/claude-skills, commit 27cfcd0fb0a4, path c-level-advisor/skills/ciso-advisor, licence MIT. The upstream licence file ships inside the skill.