Analyzes social media campaign data to calculate engagement rates, ROI, and cost-per-engagement metrics. Compares performance against platform-specific benchmarks to provide actionable recommendations.
Say it in your own words; the assistant finds this recipe by itself. Examples:
Use this skill when the user provides social media post data (likes, reach, spend) and wants to calculate performance metrics like engagement rate or ROI. It is ideal for comparing campaign results against industry standards for specific platforms like Instagram or LinkedIn. Also use it when the user asks for a social media audit or wants to identify top-performing posts.
Campaign performance analysis with engagement metrics, ROI calculations, and platform benchmarks.
Analyze social media campaign performance:
| Field | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| platform | Yes | instagram, facebook, twitter, linkedin, tiktok |
| posts[] | Yes | Array of post data |
| posts[].likes | Yes | Like/reaction count |
| posts[].comments | Yes | Comment count |
| posts[].reach | Yes | Unique users reached |
| posts[].impressions | No | Total views |
| posts[].shares | No | Share/retweet count |
| posts[].saves | No | Save/bookmark count |
| posts[].clicks | No | Link clicks |
| total_spend | No | Ad spend (for ROI) |
Before analysis, verify:
Engagement Rate = (Likes + Comments + Shares + Saves) / Reach × 100
| Metric | Formula | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement Rate | Engagements / Reach × 100 | Audience interaction level |
| CTR | Clicks / Impressions × 100 | Content click appeal |
| Reach Rate | Reach / Followers × 100 | Content distribution |
| Virality Rate | Shares / Impressions × 100 | Share-worthiness |
| Save Rate | Saves / Reach × 100 | Content value |
| Rating | Engagement Rate | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Excellent | > 6% | Scale and replicate |
| Good | 3-6% | Optimize and expand |
| Average | 1-3% | Test improvements |
| Poor | < 1% | Analyze and pivot |
Calculate return on ad spend:
| Metric | Formula |
|---|---|
| Cost Per Engagement (CPE) | Total Spend / Total Engagements |
| Cost Per Click (CPC) | Total Spend / Total Clicks |
| Cost Per Thousand (CPM) | (Spend / Impressions) × 1000 |
| Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) | Revenue / Ad Spend |
| Action | Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Like | $0.50 | Brand awareness |
| Comment | $2.00 | Active engagement |
| Share | $5.00 | Amplification |
| Save | $3.00 | Intent signal |
| Click | $1.50 | Traffic value |
| ROI % | Rating | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| > 500% | Excellent | Scale budget significantly |
| 200-500% | Good | Increase budget moderately |
| 100-200% | Acceptable | Optimize before scaling |
| 0-100% | Break-even | Review targeting and creative |
| < 0% | Negative | Pause and restructure |
| Platform | Average | Good | Excellent |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.22% | 3-6% | >6% | |
| 0.07% | 0.5-1% | >1% | |
| Twitter/X | 0.05% | 0.1-0.5% | >0.5% |
| 2.0% | 3-5% | >5% | |
| TikTok | 5.96% | 8-15% | >15% |
| Platform | Average | Good | Excellent |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.22% | 0.5-1% | >1% | |
| 0.90% | 1.5-2.5% | >2.5% | |
| 0.44% | 1-2% | >2% | |
| TikTok | 0.30% | 0.5-1% | >1% |
| Platform | Average | Good |
|---|---|---|
| $0.97 | <$0.50 | |
| $1.20 | <$0.70 | |
| $5.26 | <$3.00 | |
| TikTok | $1.00 | <$0.50 |
See references/platform-benchmarks.md for complete benchmark data.
python scripts/calculate_metrics.py assets/sample_input.json
Calculates engagement rate, CTR, reach rate for each post and campaign totals.
python scripts/analyze_performance.py assets/sample_input.json
Generates full performance analysis with ROI, benchmarks, and recommendations.
Output includes: - Campaign-level metrics - Post-by-post breakdown - Benchmark comparisons - Top performers ranked - Actionable recommendations
See assets/sample_input.json:
{
"platform": "instagram",
"total_spend": 500,
"posts": [
{
"post_id": "post_001",
"content_type": "image",
"likes": 342,
"comments": 28,
"shares": 15,
"saves": 45,
"reach": 5200,
"impressions": 8500,
"clicks": 120
}
]
}
See assets/expected_output.json:
{
"campaign_metrics": {
"total_engagements": 1521,
"avg_engagement_rate": 8.36,
"ctr": 1.55
},
"roi_metrics": {
"total_spend": 500.0,
"cost_per_engagement": 0.33,
"roi_percentage": 660.5
},
"insights": {
"overall_health": "excellent",
"benchmark_comparison": {
"engagement_status": "excellent",
"engagement_benchmark": "1.22%",
"engagement_actual": "8.36%"
}
}
}
The sample campaign shows: - Engagement rate 8.36% vs 1.22% benchmark = Excellent (6.8x above average) - CTR 1.55% vs 0.22% benchmark = Excellent (7x above average) - ROI 660% = Outstanding return on $500 spend - Recommendation: Scale budget, replicate successful elements
references/platform-benchmarks.md contains:
| When you ask for... | You get... |
|---|---|
| "Social media audit" | Performance analysis across platforms with benchmarks |
| "What's performing?" | Top content analysis with patterns and recommendations |
| "Competitor social analysis" | Competitive social media comparison with gaps |
All output passes quality verification: - Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring - Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act - Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.
HOW_TO_USE.mdLICENSESKILL.mdassets/expected_output.jsonassets/sample_input.jsonreferences/platform-benchmarks.mdscripts/analyze_performance.pyscripts/calculate_metrics.pyVendored from alirezarezvani/claude-skills, commit 27cfcd0fb0a4, path marketing-skill/skills/social-media-analyzer, licence MIT. The upstream licence file ships inside the skill.