Percerno Skillsbeta
← everything it can do · slides

Vpe Review TEXT

Performs a throughput-first interrogation of engineering plans regarding delivery metrics, hiring funnels, team structure, and production discipline. It generates a structured verdict (Ship, Sharpen, or Block) based on DORA metrics, cycle time analysis, and organizational health checks.

2 uses this weeksource alirezarezvanilicence MIT
Quality gate: FAIL · makes it possible · measured 2026-10-24
Delivered a valid file in 0 of 2 requests; the bare model cannot produce this file type.
0/2 requests produced a file that opens
Security scan: clean · 2026-10-24 · 1 files · ran in sandbox
no network calls, shell tricks, credential access or instruction tampering found in its files.

Try asking

Say it in your own words; the assistant finds this recipe by itself. Examples:

“Kør en VPE-gennemgang af vores leveringsplan for Q4, før vi godkender den.”
“Vores DORA-metrikker er faldet markant. Kan du analysere, hvor flaskehalsen sidder i vores udviklingsproces?”
“Vi overvejer at reorganisere ingeniørholdene. Er vores nuværende struktur sund ift. antallet af ansatte?”
“Run a VPE review on our Q3 delivery plan before we commit to the board.”
“Our sprint velocity has dropped 20% in the last month. Can you pressure-test our current engineering operations?”
“I have a proposal to hire 15 backend engineers next quarter. Please analyze the hiring funnel risks.”
Try this skill from Claude, ChatGPT or a chat on your own page. Free plan, no credit card.Get started free

Good for

vpe-reviewdora-metricsengineering-opshiring-funnelteam-structurecycle-timeproduction-disciplinedelivery-throughputc-level-advisor

Not for

Do not use this skill for high-level architectural decisions or technology stack selection, which should be handled by the CTO review skill. It is not intended for general HR compensation strategy or budget envelope calculations, which belong to the CHRO or CFO advisors respectively.

Details

When it is the right choice

Use this skill when evaluating plans that impact engineering delivery speed, such as quarterly OKRs, sprint commitments, or release schedules. It is also the correct choice before approving engineering hiring waves, restructuring squads or tribes, or addressing declining DORA metrics and increasing production incidents.

The full recipe the assistant reads

/c-level-agents:vpe-review — VPE Forcing Questions

Command: /c-level-agents:vpe-review <plan>

The throughput-first VPE pressure-tests any plan touching eng operations. Six questions before any delivery commitment, eng hiring expansion, team restructure, or production-discipline change.

When to Run

  • Before quarterly delivery commitment (sprint planning, OKR review)
  • Before approving an eng hiring plan
  • Before restructuring eng teams (splitting/merging squads, adding tribes)
  • Before deciding whether to hire a VPE separately from CTO (or merge them)
  • When production incidents are increasing
  • When sprint velocity is dropping but everyone says "we're working hard"

The Six VPE Questions

1. What's the cycle time, and where does work wait?

No DORA, no diagnosis. - Lead Time for Changes is the single best health metric - If you can't decompose cycle time into stages, you can't fix the bottleneck - Run delivery_throughput_analyzer.py

2. What's the DORA performance level on all 4 metrics?

One Elite metric and three Lows = bad. Four Highs = healthy. - Deployment Frequency, Lead Time, MTTR, Change Failure Rate - The worst metric defines overall level - Fix lead time first; everything else follows

3. Where is the hiring funnel leaking?

"Can't find good engineers" is wrong. - Specific stage is over-filtering OR top-of-funnel volume is too low OR offer-to-accept is broken - Run eng_hiring_funnel_calculator.py - If offer-to-accept < 70%, comp is below market or close discipline is weak

4. Is the team structure healthy for the headcount?

5-9 ICs per squad; 5-8 ICs per EM; 4-6 EMs per director. - Run eng_team_structure_designer.py - Manager-trigger fires when 5+ ICs have no dedicated EM - Director-trigger fires when 3+ EMs report directly to VPE/CTO

5. What's the production discipline maturity?

Level 1-5; aim for Level 3 at growth stage. - On-call rotation ≥ 6 people - Severity-defined incident response with blameless postmortems - SLOs on customer-facing services (pair with engineering/slo-architect/) - Continuous deployment OR scheduled — not "usually one, sometimes the other"

6. Are we adding a VPE separately, or is CTO doing both?

If CTO is spending > 50% on management vs strategy, VPE is needed. - Or: VPE complement when CTO is co-founder more comfortable with strategy - VPE owns operating model; CTO owns architecture - At small scale (< 20 eng), one person can do both

Workflow

# 1. Delivery throughput
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/c-level-advisor/vpe-advisor/scripts/delivery_throughput_analyzer.py sprint_metrics.json

# 2. Hiring funnel
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/c-level-advisor/vpe-advisor/scripts/eng_hiring_funnel_calculator.py funnel.json

# 3. Team structure
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/c-level-advisor/vpe-advisor/scripts/eng_team_structure_designer.py team.json

Output Format

# VPE Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD

## The Decision Being Made
[throughput | hiring | structure | production | VPE-vs-CTO]

## Delivery Throughput (if applicable)
- DORA overall: Elite / High / Medium / Low
- Worst metric: <DF | LT | MTTR | FR>
- Bottleneck: <stage> (X% of cycle time)
- Top fix: <action + owner>

## Hiring Funnel (if applicable)
- End-to-end conversion: X%
- Weakest stage: <stage>
- Pipeline gap: +N candidates needed
- Top fix: <specific action>

## Team Structure (if applicable)
- Recommended: <informal pods / squads / tribes>
- Manager trigger fired: yes/no
- Director trigger fired: yes/no
- Action: <hire EM | hire director | split squad>

## Production Discipline (if applicable)
- Current maturity level: 1-5
- Next practice to add: <specific>
- SLO coverage: X / Y services

## Verdict
🟢 SHIP | 🟡 SHARPEN | 🔴 BLOCK

## Next Steps
[3 concrete actions]

Routing

  • /c-level-agents:cto-review — for architectural causes of throughput problems
  • cs-chro-advisor agent — for hiring funnel comp/leveling issues
  • /c-level-agents:cfo-review — for cost-per-hire envelope and eng budget
  • /c-level-agents:ciso-review — for production discipline + compliance overlap
  • /c-level-agents:decide — log the verdict
  • /c-level-agents:freeze 30 — on multi-year hiring commitments

Related

  • Agent: cs-vpe-advisor
  • Skill: vpe-advisor
  • Adjacent: ../../../engineering/slo-architect/, ../../../engineering/feature-flags-architect/, ../../../engineering/chaos-engineering/

Version: 1.0.0

Files in this skill (2)
  • LICENSE
  • SKILL.md
Where it comes from

Vendored from alirezarezvani/claude-skills, commit 27cfcd0fb0a4, path c-level-agents/skills/vpe-review, licence MIT. The upstream licence file ships inside the skill.